SPEAK FOR UNCONSTITUTIONALITY!
The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, as Republic Act No. 10175
Majority netizen yell is JUNK and TO JUNK the new implemented law signed by President Noynoy Aquino,.
I think , main aim of law is to abridged the freedom of expression or of the press which unconstitutionally designed in accordance with Article III. Bill of Rights Section 4. that -" No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press"
The question therein is how was the law being observed if some of existing rule not being well implemented.
like in the case of Senate Majority Leader Tito Sotto ,Media reporting on the plagiarism issue of incumbent senator omitting to credit speech of former President John F. Kennedy.
"The issue alleging the senator committing plagiarism."
Why shall Senator Sotto, not being convicted of plagiarism?
shall be his ghost secretary or researcher and he are doing CONTRARY TO LAW?
Now, Sen. Estrada is saying Ms. Tuason also approached other senators of evil project.
Why shall senator Esrtrada, not being convicted of estoppel?
He is being stopped of his statement "-Ms. Tuason also approached other senators" ibig sabihin may alam sya.
Many question and doubts are need to be resolved like:
-Does the jail can accommodate the huge libelous creator? if so-
Does the government can shoulder their the basics needs (foods) inside the jail?
-What if a thousand prostestee post libelous are they be convicting of libel?(announcing that they are all author)
For media side or News paper Columnist or related venture, post, print and publish allegedly President Aquino, " involved in Gambling, Corruption " are they committing libel?
How about TV News Reporter who interviewing a whistle blower allegedly accused Senator Enrile, involving in PDAF. Enrile, filed against whistle blower LIBEL for defamatory reason. it is tenable?
Remember the allegation, base on to, and base on that, according to, in accordance with, the PDAF SCAM STARTS little by little and now in the proper proceedings.
ang LIBEL in lay mans term PANINIRANG PURI.
Sinong tangang manunulat ang direktang susulat ng SI SENATOR VILLAR AY SANGKOT SA PDAF SCAM! where was the presumption of innocence?
Sinong stupidong manunulat ang direktang magsasabing NAGNAKAW SI DATING PANGULONG ARROYo sa KABAN NG BAYAN SA PANAHON NG KANYANG PANUNUNGKULAN! remenber the General rule ;the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved.
Even the writer has strong fact pointing Napoles, the PDAF QUEEN they cannot conclude by saying " SI NAPOLES ANG UTAK NG PDAF.
Even Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago, (idol) has a strong POWER personality can't verdict Napoles, the Master of PDAF and Juan Ponce Enrile is the KING! WE SHOULD RESPECT THE DUE PROCESS.
WRITING ALLEGATION shall be considered libel that cause defamatory to the recipient?
does writing "ALLEGATION" is LIBEL?
Sabi ni Pinoy not Exactly pero ito ang punto "kung wala ka namang sinusulat at sinasabi na masama ba't ka matatakot sa LIBEL"
Eh kasi po Sir sa batas na ito, magiging masama na ang sumulat na maaring makasakit sa damdamin ng isang tao LIBEL agad. at hindi naman po intensyon ng mga manunulat na makasakit ng damdamin pero ito po ang nagiging output .
ikaw nga matanong ko Mr. President, Minsan ba sa buhay mo hindi kapa naksakit?
O diba? hindi kasi maiiwasan ang makasakit.
Wla naman po kasi atang manunulat ang tanging isusulat lang ay puro POSITIVE.
This law Mr. President, will DEPRIVE the right of the people to information on matters of public concern. Also this law will be used as a ground to hide malice and malicious doing of some Senator.
Ayokong mauwi na naman tayo sa kasabihang
"if a LAW is UNJUST, a MAN is NOT RIGHT TO DISOBEY it, HE is OBLIGATED TO DO SO.
